3 ms·

Almost everything you wrote is factually wrong, but I'm not prepared to write an A4 equivalent length rebuttal. It seems you have not been even tangentially kee

Almost everything you wrote is factually wrong, but I'm not prepared to write an A4 equivalent length rebuttal. It seems you have not been even tangentially keeping track of any developments after... 2015.

graycat 3y ago
> Almost everything you wrote is factually wrong I know of no such, and you gave no examples. > It seems you have not been even tangentially keeping track of any developments after... 2015. You are attacking me personally or the content of my writing? For your date 2015: A key to my Web site is some math, and it is original with me, from my research, and, thus, fully up to date! Uh, I'm able to do such math partly because I hold a Ph.D. in applied math from a world famous university; for more, I've published peer-reviewed papers in applied math, saved FedEx with some applied math for the BoD, taught applied math in some famous universities, both graduate and undergraduate, and, oh yes, published peer reviewed original research in artificial intelligence. Also taught computer science at Georgetown University. There was a LOT going on in the Internet and the Web, HTML, SQL, etc. long before your 2015: Gee, there was a nice introduction to developing Web sites in Jim Buyens, 'Web Database Development, Step by Step: .NET Edition', ISBN 0-7356-1637-X, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, 2002. Yup, that's 2002, long before your 2015! That book is an example of excellent technical writing. There are 15 chapters with nice introductions to each of VB.NET, ASP.NET, ADO.NET, database and SQL, one chapter for each, plus more -- all from 2002! The book does not emphasize how to use JavaScript to make Web pages that jump around for no good reason, make users angry and leave, and hurt the ad revenue. Net, in simple terms, what is new and important about my work is my original math; nearly all the rest of the tools used and features implemented goes back to the last century. For some irony, and also a good lesson, consider Hacker News and its functionality and user interface, both that go back largely or entirely to the last century. Uh, for "developments" since your 2015, for the back end, that has my original math which is fully up to date, and for the front end, i.e., the user interface, in general, in simple terms, for my Web pages, each new technique would be something more users don't understand and that, thus, might hurt the success of the site. Let's see, since your 2015: Pizza is really OLD, and Pizza Hut is worth $38 billion. Hamburgers are really OLD, and McDonald's is worth $193 billion. Burger King, $34 billion. My 1986 Chevy S-10 Blazer had good electronic fuel injection, no other digital electronics, and standard sealed beam headlights which for me made it as up to date as I want -- for anything since then, for me it's useless or annoying, more to buy, and more to maintain so I don't want it.
- lloydatkinson 3y ago
  I think you need to talk to someone

graycat 3y ago

> Almost everything you wrote is factually wrong I know of no such, and you gave no examples. > It seems you have not been even tangentially keeping track of any developments after... 2015. You are attacking me personally or the content of my writing? For your date 2015: A key to my Web site is some math, and it is original with me, from my research, and, thus, fully up to date! Uh, I'm able to do such math partly because I hold a Ph.D. in applied math from a world famous university; for more, I've published peer-reviewed papers in applied math, saved FedEx with some applied math for the BoD, taught applied math in some famous universities, both graduate and undergraduate, and, oh yes, published peer reviewed original research in artificial intelligence. Also taught computer science at Georgetown University. There was a LOT going on in the Internet and the Web, HTML, SQL, etc. long before your 2015: Gee, there was a nice introduction to developing Web sites in Jim Buyens, 'Web Database Development, Step by Step: .NET Edition', ISBN 0-7356-1637-X, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, 2002. Yup, that's 2002, long before your 2015! That book is an example of excellent technical writing. There are 15 chapters with nice introductions to each of VB.NET, ASP.NET, ADO.NET, database and SQL, one chapter for each, plus more -- all from 2002! The book does not emphasize how to use JavaScript to make Web pages that jump around for no good reason, make users angry and leave, and hurt the ad revenue. Net, in simple terms, what is new and important about my work is my original math; nearly all the rest of the tools used and features implemented goes back to the last century. For some irony, and also a good lesson, consider Hacker News and its functionality and user interface, both that go back largely or entirely to the last century. Uh, for "developments" since your 2015, for the back end, that has my original math which is fully up to date, and for the front end, i.e., the user interface, in general, in simple terms, for my Web pages, each new technique would be something more users don't understand and that, thus, might hurt the success of the site. Let's see, since your 2015: Pizza is really OLD, and Pizza Hut is worth $38 billion. Hamburgers are really OLD, and McDonald's is worth $193 billion. Burger King, $34 billion. My 1986 Chevy S-10 Blazer had good electronic fuel injection, no other digital electronics, and standard sealed beam headlights which for me made it as up to date as I want -- for anything since then, for me it's useless or annoying, more to buy, and more to maintain so I don't want it.

lloydatkinson 3y ago
I think you need to talk to someone