4 ms·
With an MoE you only need to train a smaller model which you can then combine into an x8 and finetune/train the router. Mistral used their 7B base to make Mixtr
by rileyphone 2y ago
With an MoE you only need to train a smaller model which you can then combine into an x8 and finetune/train the router. Mistral used their 7B base to make Mixtral, Qwen's new MoE uses their 1.8B model upscaled to 2.7B, pretty sure Grok also trained a smaller model first.
- samus 2y agoYou're only correct about Qwen's MoE. I presume that Chinese model builders feel more pressure to be efficient about using their GPU time because of sanctions.
- phree_radical 2y agoVery incorrect! The "8x7b" in the name regularly confuses people into some similar conclusion, but there are not eight 7b "experts" in Mixtral 8x. It's more apt to think of all 256 FFN's as the "experts," as each expert FFN on a given layer has no relation to the expert FFN's on other layers. You need to train them all within the MoE architecture, as combining existing models ("clown car MoE") works, but isn't gaining anything from the architecture/sparsity
- epups 2y agoSorry, could you expand on this a bit further? Are you saying that for a MoE, you want to train the exact same model, and then just finetune the feed forward networks differently for each of them? And you're saying that separately training 8 different models would not be efficient - do we have evidence for that?