4 ms·

Why do you say they cause higher prices for rewards recipients? Is there evidence of this?

• oezi 3y ago
  The cost of running the rewards scheme must be paid. It is like a tax you incur. Also the cost for you to participate can be substantial in the form of time/attention. All for 1%-2% rebate. Many rewards programs are also predatory in the way they want to sell your data so you are targeted by advertisers for products you wouldn't buy otherwise.
  • abalone 3y ago
    But if the tax is refunded to rewards recipients then it does not result in net higher prices for them. Granted, some slice of it is kept by the issuers, but it turns out issuers mostly make money on interest not interchange.[1] [1] https://www.valuepenguin.com/how-do-credit-card-companies-make-money https://www.valuepenguin.com/how-do-credit-card-companies-ma...
    • t0mas88 3y ago
      The recipients need to think about were to shop, switch cards once in a while, all extra work to get 1% back of the 2% that the card issuers extract from the economy. Meanwhile in Europe the issuers are capable of running a profitable business on only 0.3% fees (and much lower for debit). So even though you may think rewards programs are nice, they are in the end costing you more, not giving you free money.
      • WhiteOwlLion 2y ago
        If you're only getting back 1% to 2%, you're losing out on better cash back cards.