4 ms·
I agree we need to do that, but I would argue at this point, the best option for the people without the skills/interest is probably buying a Synology. It would
by filmgirlcw 3y ago
I agree we need to do that, but I would argue at this point, the best option for the people without the skills/interest is probably buying a Synology. It would be awesome if there was a free OSS solution that people could just follow instructions and deploy on an inexpensive miniPC and not have to worry about anything and have auto-updates and zero problems, but I don't know if that is realistic. If we do ever see it, I feel confident it won't be free.
I see tools like this as a really good middle ground between piecing all the different parts together and managing runbooks and whatnot and buying an off-the-shelf appliance like a Synology or other consumer/prosumer/SMB NAS.
- ocdtrekkie 3y agoSandstorm does this, although we are badly in need of funding, contributors, and all the things needed to meaningfully run an open source project. Our updates are generally evergreen but we are currently blocked on offering that while we establish a new community-run infrastructure and development process. The problem is you do need to reinvent everything to do this right, and reinventing everything is hard and a bit of a slog. Some problems are also just... still hard, there's no secure and good way to help someone open a port on their home router.
- adr1an 3y agoOpen ports? Nowadays people just use tailscale.. AFAIK
- ocdtrekkie 3y agoI mean I suppose it depends on how you want to limit your server setup, and what limitations you have (i.e. CGNAT). Considering I regularly share things on my server with others, and I let other people who are less technically inclined use my server, having to use a VPN service to access it would be extremely suboptimal for that. I also don't want to have to host a proxy server out on a public provider.
- adr1an 3y agoTrueNAS and Proxmox are easy too, I don't know what Synology runs as OS.