4 ms·
Arrrg, this is what I get for answering this while distracted, I did not multiply by 8. So it was 400cf or 0.4kcf for $10, so yeah you are right. That's actual
by lucisferre 3y ago
Arrrg, this is what I get for answering this while distracted, I did not multiply by 8.
So it was 400cf or 0.4kcf for $10, so yeah you are right. That's actually not terribly far off their white paper actually. It's not as good as current market prices $12/kcf but it is not so far off, particularly if you consider potential subsidies for capturing carbon.
Thanks for that.
- bryanlarsen 3y agoOn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NngCHTImH1g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NngCHTImH1g he says the goal is $100/tonne carbon capture and $1/kg H2, which puts those inputs well under the $10/kcf leaving some margin for the cost of the sabatier. Both processes are directly proportional to the cost of electricity and heat so assuming the thesis of decreasing solar costs holds true, it's a question of when not if.
- lucisferre 3y agoYeah that would be pretty amazing.