From the ruling: >Inhance asserts that “new” means “having recently come into existence,” or “not previously existing.” >the EPA argues that a “significant ne

From the ruling: >Inhance asserts that “new” means “having recently come into existence,” or “not previously existing.” >the EPA argues that a “significant new use” is any use “not previously known to the EPA.”[0] Lots of commenters seem outraged by the court's decision here but to me EPA's claim is outrageous. [0] https://peer.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3_22_24-Fifth-Circuit-Opinion.pdf https://peer.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3_22_24-Fifth-Ci...