20 ms·
There are layers upon layers in culture when it comes to Freud. Freud was fashionable beyond the reality of his importance, they said. Then the "Freud as misi
by nonrandomstring 2y ago
There are layers upon layers in culture when it comes to Freud.
Freud was fashionable beyond the reality of his importance, they said.
Then the "Freud as misinderstood" revisionists ruled, for a while.
Then it was fashionable to discredit and mock Freud. He became the
epitome of all that's "unscientific".
Then the neo-Freudians came along and was fashionable to denounce the
rigid, autistic positivists who so loudly mocked Freud.
And so it goes.
Meanwhile his nephew Edward Bernays totally transformed Western culture
into what we see today... a fantasy driven garden of individual Utopian
projects.
And if you bracket the crazy penis-envy unconscious analysis stuff
aside, then "Civilisation and Its Discontents" remains one of the most
prescient discourses on our current condition ever written [0].
There's one great test that a thinker is not irrelevant... that people
are still talking about them 100 years later.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Disconten...