3 ms·
No. As a taxpayer, my money is already going to 1230987587123 government frivolities. I don't need to be funding infrastructure for bigcorps any more than I alr
by slackfan 3y ago
No. As a taxpayer, my money is already going to 1230987587123 government frivolities. I don't need to be funding infrastructure for bigcorps any more than I already am.
e: To the downvoters, do you seriously believe that Tesla, Apple, MSFT, Amazon, etc require MORE government assistance?
- SwellJoe 3y agoWe could try taxing corporations again. Just a thought.
- eadmund 3y agoWe do tax corporations in America, at a rate which is in the middle of the pack worldwide.
- slackfan 3y agoOr just the critically undersupported infra fail. The world will not end, and the money will magically appear out of thin air, guaranteed, and the public wouldn't even have to pay for it. I do realize that living without uber eats/electronic banking/social media for a few days is unfortunately, untenable for the vast majority of the population.
- patrickmay 3y agoCorporate taxes are passed on to consumers. It will still be individual citizens paying for it.
- Arathorn 3y ago> e: To the downvoters, do you seriously believe that Tesla, Apple, MSFT, Amazon, etc require MORE government assistance? This is just throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Just because big tech companies happen to build on FOSS projects doesn't mean that the FOSS maintenance shouldn't be borne by everyone, given they benefit everyone (including the governments themselves). And in fact, if the Big Tech companies paid their tax, they'd contribute as much (if not more!) as everyone.
- slackfan 3y agoThey don't benefit everyone, and even among those who benefit, not everybody benefits equally.
- slily 3y agoHow do you qualify this as "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" and not the suggestion of yielding government control of OSS? That is the disproportionate reaction, and I urge anyone pushing for more government control/spending to catch up on history.