3 ms·
Vercels hosting is ok. I prefer cloudflare and AWS but vercel is still best for next.js first class support. Especially on newest versions. For instance, server
by blovescoffee 3y ago
Vercels hosting is ok. I prefer cloudflare and AWS but vercel is still best for next.js first class support. Especially on newest versions. For instance, server functions currently don’t work on cloudflares nextjs hosting. There’s some discussion about it on discord and GitHub. However, once something becomes the new fad and takes over from nextjs, I’m not sure what vercel will do.
Also checking the vercel page, they have so many investors, how do they all expect a company predicated on a JavaScript framework to be around in 10 years.
- pjmlp 3y agoThanks to the deals that have done with several CMS companies, they are now pretty much the default option when using one of those CMS, if one wants tier 1 tooling support for all their workflows. Example, it used to be when using Sitecore, most of its extensions points would be .NET, now in their SaaS products, .NET is 2nd class, if you really want to use their tooling, without filling in the gaps yourself, the answer is Next.js.
- threatofrain 3y agoVercel wants to be a mini-AWS for all JS frameworks, and NextJS is just a tool to direct people to their cloud services.