3 ms·
12MAR24 is so close. If they just went with 12MAR2024 it would have been unambiguous. Of course it lacks many advantages of ISO8601 like sorting correctly in a
by wongarsu 3y ago
12MAR24 is so close. If they just went with 12MAR2024 it would have been unambiguous.
Of course it lacks many advantages of ISO8601 like sorting correctly in alphabetical sorting or working across languages, but it's a huge step up from 3/12/24.