3 ms·

I think the consent of the person whose body parts (or AI-imagined body parts) are being shown makes a bit of a difference.

pierat 3y ago
[flagged]
- stetrain 3y ago
  Oof.
- op00to 3y ago
  If I upload my kids picture to a website that reimagines them as an elf, I give consent to that. I clearly do not give consent to creating an image of my kid dressed up in a nazi uniform saluting Hitler. Giving consent to one thing doesn’t imply that every other possible use of the technology is also consented to.
- Kerb_ 3y ago
  Lotta people do and have been taking issue with gambling and lottery advertisements since before AI got involved. I'd imagine that group is going to continue beating that drum regardless of the technology used to sell gambling and don't feel the need to ask.
- bigbillheck 3y ago
  I think if you thought the post was worth making in the first place it's a matter of personal integrity to keep it up even in the face of pushback, downvotes, or flagging.
  - pierat 3y ago
    And brigading here is also a thing, and comes at punishments of less karma and rate-limiting. Most people want the "expected talking points", and especially so here. If you ask the bigger questions, and people collectively lose their shit. I removed the text from other posts because people have comprehension problems, and resort to personal attacks. There's a whole slew of questions here, to of which its just "hate ai" is the expected response. 1. Why the double standard of women's (not men's) nipples equated to porn? [sex equality concerns] 2. Is this even porn? Even SCOTUS has the position of "I'll know it when I see it". Contrast this with non-sexual nudity, which too is a thing. 3. Is a privacy policy/clickthrough account creation adequate for consent? https://www.walottery.com/Privacy/ https://www.walottery.com/Privacy/ 4. Why is the Washington Lottery (government org) using AI at all in the facilitation of gambling? 5. What other AI generated content is Washington Lottery saving, as per Washington State Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW ?

pierat 3y ago

[flagged]

stetrain 3y ago
Oof.
op00to 3y ago
If I upload my kids picture to a website that reimagines them as an elf, I give consent to that. I clearly do not give consent to creating an image of my kid dressed up in a nazi uniform saluting Hitler. Giving consent to one thing doesn’t imply that every other possible use of the technology is also consented to.
Kerb_ 3y ago
Lotta people do and have been taking issue with gambling and lottery advertisements since before AI got involved. I'd imagine that group is going to continue beating that drum regardless of the technology used to sell gambling and don't feel the need to ask.
bigbillheck 3y ago
I think if you thought the post was worth making in the first place it's a matter of personal integrity to keep it up even in the face of pushback, downvotes, or flagging.
- pierat 3y ago
  And brigading here is also a thing, and comes at punishments of less karma and rate-limiting. Most people want the "expected talking points", and especially so here. If you ask the bigger questions, and people collectively lose their shit. I removed the text from other posts because people have comprehension problems, and resort to personal attacks. There's a whole slew of questions here, to of which its just "hate ai" is the expected response. 1. Why the double standard of women's (not men's) nipples equated to porn? [sex equality concerns] 2. Is this even porn? Even SCOTUS has the position of "I'll know it when I see it". Contrast this with non-sexual nudity, which too is a thing. 3. Is a privacy policy/clickthrough account creation adequate for consent? https://www.walottery.com/Privacy/ https://www.walottery.com/Privacy/ 4. Why is the Washington Lottery (government org) using AI at all in the facilitation of gambling? 5. What other AI generated content is Washington Lottery saving, as per Washington State Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW ?