3 ms·
> you never need to think about it, only get smaller and more beautiful files People said the same thing last time and it took more than 10 years until decodin
by simon_o 2y ago
> you never need to think about it, only get smaller and more beautiful files
People said the same thing last time and it took more than 10 years until decoding worked reliably. I'm simply not interested in dealing with another JPEG++.
> Perhaps open up your thinking on this?
Nah, I'm fine. I went JXL-only for anything new I'm publishing, and if people need to switch browsers to see it – so be it.
- JyrkiAlakuijala 2y agoIt's not a new JPEG++. It creates old JPEGs, fully 100% compatible. (Of course JXL is better still.)
- lxgr 2y ago> I went JXL-only for anything new I'm publishing, and if people need to switch browsers to see it – so be it. This makes your website only viewable on Safari (and by extension Apple devices) only, right?