Thanks for that additional context. Still, there are enough other parallels with BUSL-only Hashicorp code, including several identical new filenames, that the q

Thanks for that additional context. Still, there are enough other parallels with BUSL-only Hashicorp code, including several identical new filenames, that the questions raised by the article seem fair as questions to me. I don’t think the article claims to answer them more definitively than initial speculation. (That is, the article is noting a bunch of observations and saying what it looks like to the author, explicitly without firmly asserting any underlying truth.) At the very least, a court would probably send an infringement lawsuit on this basis to trial, surviving an initial motion to dismiss, regardless of what the eventual verdict might be after full fact-finding.