>I don't think so. Not if you want to get DESTDIR support right, and proper dependency tracking (dep info as a side-effect of compilation, so you get all the he

>I don't think so. Not if you want to get DESTDIR support right, and proper dependency tracking (dep info as a side-effect of compilation, so you get all the headers and don't slow down one-off builds), and support for all the standard Makefile targets, etc. With any make, yes. With modern GNU make you can embed sh code inside a makefile with the define hack, so no, ugly, but no.