>a fuzzer, which had to be disabled for the exploit to succeed. According to this comment, the fuzzer wouldn't have detected it. It wasn't necessary to disable

>a fuzzer, which had to be disabled for the exploit to succeed. According to this comment, the fuzzer wouldn't have detected it. It wasn't necessary to disable the fuzzer: >https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39911249 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39911249