I read some of the dissent document above. While Carr is obviously biased and uses inflammatory language, and makes some illogical arguments, his arguments on t

I read some of the dissent document above. While Carr is obviously biased and uses inflammatory language, and makes some illogical arguments, his arguments on the "Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act"[1] are much better-reasoned and appear to come from solid legal standing. His opinion is that net neutrality isn't a problem. I think that's absolutely incorrect - but I do agree with his opinion that Title II isn't necessarily the right way to solve net neutrality. The linked dissent below is more worth reading. [1] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-398477A3.pdf https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-398477A3.pdf