2 ms·
While saying "we want more efficiency" is great there is a trade off between size and accuracy here. It is possible that compressing and using all of human kno
by nl 3y ago
While saying "we want more efficiency" is great there is a trade off between size and accuracy here.
It is possible that compressing and using all of human knowledge takes a lot of memory and in some cases the accuracy is more important than reducing memory usage.
For example [1] shows how Gemma 2B using AVX512 instructions could solve problems it couldn't solve using AVX2 because of rounding issues with the lower-memory instructions. It's likely that most quantization (and other memory reduction schemes) have similar problems.
As we develop more multi-modal models that can do things like understand 3D video in better than real time it's likely memory requirements will increase, not decrease.
[1] https://github.com/google/gemma.cpp/issues/23 https://github.com/google/gemma.cpp/issues/23