That would be a most temporary ownership I should think. Inherently unstable countries tend to get rid of the rulers at a high frequency than stable ones. Unle

That would be a most temporary ownership I should think. Inherently unstable countries tend to get rid of the rulers at a high frequency than stable ones. Unless you have the military power to maintain dictatorship and money to buy the protection of a superpower. But even then it is tenuous. Taking over a stable country would be far easier in the long term. Yet when stable countries undergo major change, they tend to gravitate towards unstableness.