4 ms·
The first paragraph in Wuffs's README explicitly states that it's good for both encoding and decoding?
by Hackbraten 3y ago
The first paragraph in Wuffs's README explicitly states that it's good for both encoding and decoding?
- Sesse__ 3y agoNo, it states that wrangling _can be_ encoding. It does not in any way state that Wuffs is actually _good_ for it at the current stage, and I do not know of any nontrivial encoder built with Wuffs, ever. (In contrast, there are 18 example decoders included with Wuffs. I assume you don't count the checksum functions as encoding.)