3 ms·
Gamers have testably higher in-game performance at higher framerates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA
by causi 3y ago
Gamers have testably higher in-game performance at higher framerates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA
- kanbankaren 3y agoThe US military has done research on refresh rates to find out the optimum refresh rate for pilots and their conclusion was the same. Beyond 60fps, there is not a benefit. There was another research which discussed about a latency in the brain of around 15ms. Even if the visual system could detect a change, not much could be done with that change due to the inherent latency.
- 082349872349872 3y agoNote that hearing and touch have higher "frame" rates.
- thfuran 3y ago>There was another research which discussed about a latency in the brain of around 15ms. Even if the visual system could detect a change, not much could be done with that change due to the inherent latency. That claim does not support that conclusion. 15 ms is roughly the frame time at 60 fps, meaning framerate potentially accounts for a significant and reducible portion of overall latency.
- causi 3y agoA 45,000-pound airplane has a slower response time than a cursor on a videogame.
- kanbankaren 3y agoThe research was in relation to HUD for fighter aircraft from what I recall. Nothing to do with how the aircraft responds rather identifying targets on screen.