2 ms·
Not to mention that it's 35% more efficient than existing encoders, and can support 10+ bits per component encoding while remaining compatible with existing dec
by CharlesW 3y ago
Not to mention that it's 35% more efficient than existing encoders, and can support 10+ bits per component encoding while remaining compatible with existing decoders. That's pretty amazing.
- amluto 3y agoIt would still be nice to see a comparison to JPEG XL.
- edflsafoiewq 3y agohttps://giannirosato.com/blog/post/jpegli/ https://giannirosato.com/blog/post/jpegli/ Note that that's from almost a year ago, don't know if anything changed.