3 ms·

you dont need to use an intermediary to incorporate offshore its the same process as incorporating in any US state, where you need an agent of service or regis

you dont need to use an intermediary to incorporate offshore its the same process as incorporating in any US state, where you need an agent of service or registered agent if you dont live there pick the country just like you would pick a state and some countries have states too, the US is actually one of the weirder countries as you cant incorporate at the national level whereas in st kitts & nevis - another federation - you can do both, a st kitts & nevis entity has one set of transparency and regulations, and nevis has a different set of regulations and generally seen as more favorable its not really a taboo topic like ICIJ and some socioeconomic classes of people make it out to be. its a catalogue with offerings domestically and worldwide

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
spxneo 3y ago
if the article was about Tor, comments would be overwhelming supportive of privacy. I have a hunch about why they would be against corporate privacy and it is probably tied to socioeconomic reasons and the media they are exposed to (aka reddit)
- yieldcrv 3y ago
  the bias probably does stem from that, tor is egalitarian everyone can use it, while people perceive business vehicles as expensive and advantageous only for the wealthy
singleshot_ 3y ago
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting might be a counter example to your “states-only” comment about corporate registration — except that congress incorporated it; it did not incorporate itself. There are also federally chartered banks, although that’s not exactly the same thing. (Now I’m starting to wonder why my BizOrgs casebook was so short…)
- yieldcrv 3y ago
  yes the only incorporation at the federal level is by Congress at the moment even federal agencies register new entities with their states of choice I’m always curious what a federal incorporation statute would look like, I bet it would suck as the loudest states’ representatives and delegates would want transparency
  - anticensor 3y ago
    There is European SE companies, just adapt that type into US law maybe adding more organisation types (nationally incorporated nonprofits? why not).

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

spxneo 3y ago

if the article was about Tor, comments would be overwhelming supportive of privacy. I have a hunch about why they would be against corporate privacy and it is probably tied to socioeconomic reasons and the media they are exposed to (aka reddit)

yieldcrv 3y ago
the bias probably does stem from that, tor is egalitarian everyone can use it, while people perceive business vehicles as expensive and advantageous only for the wealthy

singleshot_ 3y ago

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting might be a counter example to your “states-only” comment about corporate registration — except that congress incorporated it; it did not incorporate itself. There are also federally chartered banks, although that’s not exactly the same thing. (Now I’m starting to wonder why my BizOrgs casebook was so short…)

yieldcrv 3y ago
yes the only incorporation at the federal level is by Congress at the moment even federal agencies register new entities with their states of choice I’m always curious what a federal incorporation statute would look like, I bet it would suck as the loudest states’ representatives and delegates would want transparency
- anticensor 3y ago
  There is European SE companies, just adapt that type into US law maybe adding more organisation types (nationally incorporated nonprofits? why not).