3 ms·
It's easy to steal or craft an identity. Having a person adopt that identity and use it over multiple in-person meetings around the world over an extended perio
by lenerdenator 3y ago
It's easy to steal or craft an identity. Having a person adopt that identity and use it over multiple in-person meetings around the world over an extended period of time is not.
Part of the appeal of cyber operations for intelligence agencies is that there's basically no tradecraft involved. You park some hacker in front of a laptop within your territory (which also happens to have a constitution forbidding the extradition of citizens) and the hacker strikes at targets through obfuscated digital vectors of attack. They never go in public, they never get a photo taken of them, they never get trailed by counterintelligence.
If you start telling people who want to be FLOSS repo maintainers that they'll need to be at a few in-person meetings over a span of two or three years if they want the keys to the project, that hacker has a much harder job, because in-person social engineering is hard. It has to be the same person showing up, time after time, and that person has to be able to talk the language of someone intimately familiar with the technology while being someone they're not.
It's not a cure-all but for supply chain attacks, it makes the operation a lot riskier, resource-intense, and time-consuming.
- jpc0 3y agoMany OSS contributors likely don't have "fly to distant country for mandatory meeting" money. You are excluding a ton of contributors based on geography and income. It's not common that I find this line actually decent but check your privilege with this kind of comment. This is really a small step away from segregation.
- xcrunner529 3y agoThere are multiple ways to vet identity. Even just knowing location and such. This person used a VPN. A big red flag.