> Applying the law in that way just seems to be a way to enable bullying of the little guy by rich corporations. Agreed. The owners are under zero obligation

> Applying the law in that way just seems to be a way to enable bullying of the little guy by rich corporations. Agreed. The owners are under zero obligation to sell as is, what is that line again that companies love to use? "We have a right to refuse service to anyone, as long as it's not discriminating against a particular class under federal, state, or local law." This would be like a dealership suing a bunch of people because they refused to trade in their car to them while someone was protesting the dealership and said "these cars are worth more than XY dealership offers, don't trade to them."