> Nunely’s refusal to throw out the case doesn’t necessarily mean that California Forever will win its legal case. So I’m guessing this is a motion to dismiss

> Nunely’s refusal to throw out the case doesn’t necessarily mean that California Forever will win its legal case. So I’m guessing this is a motion to dismiss that was denied? Very short on details here. Would also be good to know what the elements required for the price fixing law they are suing under.