3 ms·
There is also no such thing as “the scientific community”. That’s a shibboleth deployed to shut arguments down with an ostensible show of authority.
by camdenlock 3y ago
There is also no such thing as “the scientific community”. That’s a shibboleth deployed to shut arguments down with an ostensible show of authority.
- pavlov 3y agoYes, nobody knows anything, so it’s best to do your own research on YouTube.
- defrost 3y agoThere very much is, however, a global collective of everybody who has gathered atmospheric, ocean, and geophysical data and|or submitted a peer reviewed paper to a recognised peer reviewed journal. This includes people from all the G20 countries, many non G20 countries, purely academic researchers, exploration geophysicists working for transnational energy and mineral extraction companies, etc. Within this body of people that can math well, understand numerical models, deal with gravity, planetary positions, magnetic fields, atmospheric gases, radiometric backgrounds, continent drift, glacial isostatic adjustment, tides, etc. there is a documented and overwhelming consensus. https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-conse... https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/isnt-there-lot-disagreement-among-climate-scientists-about-global-warming https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/isnt-there-... People that don't understand any of that are more likely to doubt.
- willmadden 2y agoWell, of course most papers claim humans cause global warming. If your research supports that claim you are awarded copious amounts of grant money and academic recognition. What about this document, signed by over 1,100 scientists including nobel prize winners? https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/WCD-version-06272215121.pdf https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/WCD-version-0...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]