4 ms·
Hah, you'll get down voted to oblivion on HN for recommending Windows over Mac. But broadly speaking you are right. I run software today on Windows 11 that I f
by bruce511 3y ago
Hah, you'll get down voted to oblivion on HN for recommending Windows over Mac.
But broadly speaking you are right. I run software today on Windows 11 that I first acquired in the 90s. Some of it console based that run under the command prompt.
While Windows is justly famous for backward compatibility though, there are some exceptions.
Firstly 16 bit programs don't run on 64 bit Windows. (Well, unless I fire up a 32 bit Windows in a VM.) This is not a train smash for me, although I did have to replace some -really- old programs.
Secondly, games. MS removed a cdrom driver which a lot of my old games used for copy protection. I'll need to dual boot those into win 7 if I wanted to play them. But the urge to even bother only strikes about once a year.
Regarding word processors, I used Word Perfect in the DOS days and Word since then, and everything still opens fine.
Obviously everyone's path is different, and their experience is different, but if long-term commitment to running existing, and past, software matters to you the maybe select an OS that prioritizes that over one that very much does not.
- steve1977 3y ago> if long-term commitment to running existing, and past, software matters to you the maybe select an OS that prioritizes that over one that very much does not. I guess that's the downside of vertical integration where the OS is basically just a means to sell hardware.
- p_l 3y agoAFAIK there's Wine-based solution for win16 on 64 bit windows, which might be of interest for those wanting to run 16bit apps. And DOSBox iirc can run windows 3.x if necessary
- neckro23 3y ago> AFAIK there's Wine-based solution for win16 on 64 bit windows winevdm: https://mendelson.org/otvdm.html https://mendelson.org/otvdm.html