> And the fact that you and others won't is exactly why xz happened and why we might lose FOSS completely. As opposed to your approach, which... is also not FO

> And the fact that you and others won't is exactly why xz happened and why we might lose FOSS completely. As opposed to your approach, which... is also not FOSS. But this is a fun thread to pull: You wish to argue that it's necessary to force payment for commercial use of code. Fine; I disagree but that can be coherent. Are you doing that? Your project is commercial. Are you paying the authors of your compilers? Are you paying the authors of the open source code I see copied into your source tree? Or is it just your code that people have to pay for in order to avert the next xz?