3 ms·
Do you think that statement implies that human life is valueless or that people currently living should die? I don't. Simply having fewer children or (ideally)
by mrtesthah 3y ago
Do you think that statement implies that human life is valueless or that people currently living should die? I don't. Simply having fewer children or (ideally) using less resources per capita accomplishes that goal just fine.
- friend_and_foe 3y ago"Disdain for human life" doesn't equate to "people should die" (although I do think "there should be less people" is what some might call a dog whistle for many). Saying "there should be less people" unequivocally expresses disdain for human life, not necessarily hatred but often enough it does.