4 ms·

What's the value to users if you are NextJS based? - internal tools rarely (never?) need SEO - the complexity of NextJS rings alarm bells as infra product. A

What's the value to users if you are NextJS based? - internal tools rarely (never?) need SEO - the complexity of NextJS rings alarm bells as infra product. A look at your docs confirms my suspicion https://docs.trycreo.com/core-concepts/server-and-client-components https://docs.trycreo.com/core-concepts/server-and-client-com...

solias99 3y ago
Mainly their implementation of React Server Components, which is a far simpler set of APIs to work with compared to traditional React. (Also very LLM friendly)
- aerhardt 3y ago
  Why are RSC more LLM friendly that traditional React?
  - solias99 3y ago
    1. Very clean, easy to understand APIs. 2. Easy to make API calls. 3. Easy to reason about server/client component boundaries Makes it easy for an LLM to write code without all the cruft/boilerplate.
otabdeveloper4 3y ago
I'm guessing NextJS because internal tools need to make requests inside the DMZ without authorization. (The huge mental disconnect between people who only ever make websites and people who make business tools is amazingly huge.)
siborg 3y ago
I agree with these points. Nextjs, from my understanding, is primarily aimed at websites. I also worry about lock-in.