3 ms·
I will only mention that I don't see LLM output as overly satisfactory. Now. I would compare this to how humans use more carbon to move than a car for example.
by hawski 3y ago
I will only mention that I don't see LLM output as overly satisfactory.
Now. I would compare this to how humans use more carbon to move than a car for example. This could lead to a conclusion that we should stop moving and use more efficient propulsion to move. In car centered societies people move less and then need to exercise after hours more to have any sort of fitness at all.
Of course there is a grunt body (and soul) crushing physical movement as well as there is a grunt soul (and body) crushing writing work. But there is also a middle ground that would be something we aim for.
- CharlesW 3y ago> I will only mention that I don't see LLM output as overly satisfactory. This is changing very quickly, but even today you many not be aware of how well LLMs can create plausible drafts if you haven't seen what Claude 3 Opus can do with good prompting.
- 082349872349872 3y agoAlso, most extant text (and even more extant illustration) doesn't have to be good
- barfbagginus 3y agoIt's better than me at soft skills and communication drafting, editing and critique. It's a profound help for task planning, execution, and management. And it's a profound help for requirements generation, architecture/design explorations, legacy code annotation, test planning, and other technical things that I struggle to do on my own So honestly it's not just replacing writers. It's eliminating my need for executive officers, technical officers, and PMs I'm spending 20 month on GPT4 and I'm 2-3x more productive. Good stuff!