> Pascal's wager for nerds. You're mixing up your pre-written dismissals. Instrumental convergence has nothing to do with Pascal's Wager. Pascal's Wager for n

> Pascal's wager for nerds. You're mixing up your pre-written dismissals. Instrumental convergence has nothing to do with Pascal's Wager. Pascal's Wager for nerds would be a somewhat valid answer to "AI has the potential to destroy the world therefore we should worry about it even if it's very unlikely", but that's not the argument I made.