> Seems like just less processed is the best. See how you made assumptions (not downing ribs) and watered down the analogy (oh it’s just not-SAD) in order to r

> Seems like just less processed is the best. See how you made assumptions (not downing ribs) and watered down the analogy (oh it’s just not-SAD) in order to reach a different conclusion. The “seems like” is a totally unrelated conclusion to the N=1 that GP was talking about.