3 ms·
The patent in question: http://www.google.com/patents?id=avgEAgAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=VADIVELOO&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NvC1T8qHBemyiQLM6MnwBg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA htt
by pjscott 14y ago
The patent in question:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=avgEAgAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=VADIVELOO&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NvC1T8qHBemyiQLM6MnwBg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA http://www.google.com/patents?id=avgEAgAAEBAJ&printsec=f...
And yes, it does look like he just took fairly common statistical methods, added a bunch of awkwardly-worded stuff about how it's financial data, and you're storing it in a computer memory, so that makes it special. Or my interpretation could be off; it's not exactly a miracle of clear writing.
- chewxy 14y agoMy question: would Prior Art be considered?
- guan 14y agoIt looks like there’s a second patent with the same title: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=8131571.PN.&OS=PN/8131571&RS=PN/8131571 http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sec...