4 ms·

This needs a "April Fools" in the Headline so people don't waste time or energy reading it.

• keybored 3y ago
  Definitely unfair to post this on the second of April without a disclaimer.
  • diggan 3y ago
    > 2024-04-01 07:41 Seems to have been posted the 1st of April.
    • keybored 3y ago
      Post this to HN…
      • diggan 3y ago
        Ah :) Seems it was also submitted 1st of April: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=liw.fi https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=liw.fi I guess someone else posted it again, and the spam-filter ignored the previous entry as it didn't get any traction then.
  • squigz 3y ago
    I think ideally we'd have month/year timestamps for every link submitted, but that's probably not going to happen, so you end up with instances like this, or months-old news being taken as new, etc. I think the better solution, which I'm trying to do myself, is noting the date on the article before reading