4 ms·
It’s an interesting idea, but I don’t think it quite solves the problem here, at least as I understand the problem. The system isn’t designed to protect against
by 542458 3y ago
It’s an interesting idea, but I don’t think it quite solves the problem here, at least as I understand the problem. The system isn’t designed to protect against actively hostile/sabotaging elements inside the factory, nor was that the problem (i.e., if you have factory floor access, you could go and sabotage the plane by drilling holes in a part after it’s been installed and inspected, but that’s not the issue at hand). The issue here is skipping or skirting existing process in the name of efficiency. People aren’t trying to destroy planes, they’re just not doing their job “correctly”. Some sort of process inspector is typically what you’d use here.
- peteradio 3y agoIf you've worked on building any simple little object you know King Murphy sabotages all steps. The problem with Mr. Murphy is that he doesn't tell you when he's going to strike. Having a Murphy Larper would at least give you an insight to the processes that are supposed to thwart Herr Murphy. I'm not sure what a Process Inspector does. Do they work nights and weekends? Are they protected from reporting failures in process? Who holds responsibility for every process failure?