2 ms·
There is an argument that banning things for law abiders essentially means giving criminals preferential access. I don’t know that that idea always holds. But
by Nevermark 3y ago
There is an argument that banning things for law abiders essentially means giving criminals preferential access.
I don’t know that that idea always holds. But it definitely would for AI
All you need is ordinary commodity computing power to keep moving Ai forward. So vast numbers of individuals, organizations, and governmental actors will. Visibly or invisibly
Any blunt reactionary prohibition will only tilt things in favor of an unconstrained underground
- mattxxx 3y agoAgreed here - Stopping general access is going to not have any impact on well-funded criminals and bad-acting governments.