> https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-animal-studies-947974839488 https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-animal-... > CLAIM: Ani

> https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-animal-studies-947974839488 https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-animal-... > CLAIM: Animal studies for COVID-19 vaccines were “stopped” because the animals were dying. Not my claim. > https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2NJ1IK/ https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2NJ1IK/ > COVID-19 vaccines did not skip animal trials because of animal deaths Again, not my claim. > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/10/fact-check-pfizer-moderna-johnson-johnson-covid-vaccines-animal-studies/8262536002/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/09/10/fac... > Now some proponents of the anti-parasitic drug traditionally used for animals are falsely claiming COVID-19 vaccinations haven't passed animal studies. Not my claim either. This is my claim: human trials started before animal trials were finished: https://ncirs.org.au/phases-clinical-trials https://ncirs.org.au/phases-clinical-trials > While testing processes do typically take years, this also factors in the production to testable levels of said vaccines, whereas mRNA vaccines are far more quickly and efficiently produced, reducing this time dramatically. The quickness of production is unrelated to how long it takes to test its effects. > Also to be taken into account, work on coronavirus vaccination in humans had already been in the pipeline since the Avian Flu crises. This wasn't something new. Can you point out the mRNA vaccines developed then? > Most people couldn't access the vaccine for much longer periods of time. Certainly no-one was being forced early on (and that goes for varying definitions of the word 'forced'). Yes, lets pretend vaccine mandates didn't happen.