3 ms·
>It's a little ironic that e.g. Arch, which actually shipped the malicious code to end users since it publishes changes so much faster, as shipped never would h
by dralley 3y ago
>It's a little ironic that e.g. Arch, which actually shipped the malicious code to end users since it publishes changes so much faster, as shipped never would have executed the payload (because they didn't patch OpenSSH).
The backdoor was designed to only be injected during the building of an RPM or Debian package. Arch never would have been impacted no matter what choices they made. They were trying to hit production systems while minimizing their potential exposure to other less important types of users beforehand.