4 ms·
I think the problem may be that if you’re technical enough to want a privacy first static image host, you probably can use S3, GCP, etc. If you’re not all that
by leoh 3y ago
I think the problem may be that if you’re technical enough to want a privacy first static image host, you probably can use S3, GCP, etc.
If you’re not all that technical, you’ll just post to instagram or send on a messaging app.
Maybe some kind of feature with a static page to host images could be useful to folks? Maybe just a service that lets folks host a single image on a domain, even.
- stavros 3y agoSo what you're saying is that there is a sweet spot between the two groups, and I should market to those ten people?
- leoh 3y agofacepalm lol -- I totally fell for your April 1 joke; nice job :)
- stavros 3y agoThanks! it wasn't a joke :(
- alserio 3y agoIf you didn't want people to think it's a joke, why have you posted it less than two months _before_ April first? Also, do you have RSS on the blog? I've missed it on February, sorry
- stavros 3y agoTwo months? Jesus, I wrote this the other day. Where does the time go? I'm not sure about RSS, I'll check, but with three posts in four years, you aren't missing much. I have no idea how anyone even saw this.
- alserio 3y agoi was reading your comments on an old hn thread and you entertained the idea of writing again for the blog post, so i had to check
- Gigachad 3y agoI find the idea of hosting anything on s3 to be terrifying since someone could set up a script to spam download it and AWS will send me a $1000 bill for the usage.