3 ms·
It's not disingenuous, don't worry. Even if there were some reason that proselyting was a juncture for some employment decision (hard to see how there would be,
by hugh-avherald 3y ago
It's not disingenuous, don't worry. Even if there were some reason that proselyting was a juncture for some employment decision (hard to see how there would be, legally, but hypothetically), they could ask you to simply elaborate on that role at an interview.
- programjames 3y agoI mean, my point was kind of that they didn't mention the word "proselyting" at all. If that's what you're doing for the majority of your time, it feels like a lie of omission to not even mention it. It'd be like putting: "B.S. in Computer Science (2013–2017); attended classes at MIT; 4.0 GPA" when the reality is I went to Wellesley and cross-enrolled in a couple architecture classes. I entirely understand only selecting information that's relevant to the job. I think it's disingenuous to only select information that's relevant to the job and puts you in the best light. It's even worse if that implies you have more experience in a relevant area than you actually do. Yes, people can ask you to elaborate at an interview. But that wastes their time, and makes it so people who actually have the experience you claimed might not fit in the interviewer's schedule.