2 ms·
This doesn't have anything to do with their liability or regulations, it's what their paying customers want. A company that pays them to provide a chatbot for t
by not2b 3y ago
This doesn't have anything to do with their liability or regulations, it's what their paying customers want. A company that pays them to provide a chatbot for their business doesn't want the chatbot to say controversial things or tell people to commit suicide.
- bilbo0s 3y agoActually if it's about customers not paying them if they spit out "kill yourself" content, then I 100% understand that. These are businesses. Those servers cost money. That compute costs even more. The AI experts, (real AI experts by the way, not tensorflow and pytorch monkeys), cost big money as well. Someone better be paying for all that. So if the people who want offensive content are willing to pony up the dollars, then great. I've got no problem with giving them what they want. But if they want Barbie or Cocomelon to pay for the offensive content, then yeah, they can be safely ignored. Block as much as you like. (Or rather, block as much as Barbie wants blocked. Which is probably more than you like, but they're paying you handsomely for it.)
- Y_Y 3y agoI may just be a pytorch monkey, but I cost more than a training server.