3 ms·
> I'd prefer if it was opt-in, and that users were given instructions for disabling it if they want to during installation. So you mean an informed opt-out, ri
by moritzwarhier 3y ago
> I'd prefer if it was opt-in, and that users were given instructions for disabling it if they want to during installation.
So you mean an informed opt-out, right?
Thank you for the interesting hands-on experiences and insights regarding Bun. I followed the coverage and posts by Jarred here on HN for quite a while, think since the initial alpha release, but haven't used it.
Will keep your examples for helpful added platform APIs in mind for when I hopefully come around to doing sth with Bun!
It sounds like a great platform for JS scripting as well - I also think that could be a good and easy way to test the waters.
Really, kudos to Bun and Jarred Sumner for living up to the promise he made when the first version was announced!
- gr4vityWall 3y ago> So you mean an informed opt-out, right? I worded it wrong - I meant I'd prefer if it was opt-in, or at least informed opt-out, like you said. Thanks for pointing it out. :) > It sounds like a great platform for JS scripting as well - I also think that could be a good and easy way to test the waters. It is. Some other features you might enjoy are the built-in TypeScript support and test runner. It works well for one-off scripts too, if you'd prefer not using Bash. For me, it was refreshing coming from Node.js. Hope it is an enjoyable experience for you as well.