4 ms·
At first I thought the guy who did this was a lone wolf but now I believe it was indeed state actor. They coordinated and harassed original maintainer into givi
by mrkramer 3y ago
At first I thought the guy who did this was a lone wolf but now I believe it was indeed state actor. They coordinated and harassed original maintainer into giving them access to the project, basically they hijacked the open source project. The poor guy(the original maintainer) was alone against state actor who was persistent with the goal of hijacking and then backdooring the open source project.
It seems like they were actively looking[0] which open source compression library they can inject with vulnerable code and then exploit and backdoor afterwards.
[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/967763/ https://lwn.net/Articles/967763/
- asveikau 3y agoReading that link, it seems like the vulnerability is that a file name gets printed, so you can add terminal control characters in a file name and have it printed. https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1609#issuecomment-2028125584 https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1609#issuecomm...
- pyinstallwoes 3y ago> “Recently I've worked off-list a bit with Jia Tan on XZ Utils and” > "In 2021, JiaT75 submitted a pull request to the libarchive repository with the title ‘Added error text to warning when untaring with bsdtar’ which seemed legitimate at first glance. " Seems “Jia” is related to both
- sofixa 3y ago> At first I thought the guy who did this was a lone wolf but now I believe it was indeed state actor. They coordinated and harassed original maintainer into giving them access to the project, basically they hijacked the open source project. The poor guy(the original maintainer) was alone against state actor who was persistent with the goal of hijacking and then backdooring the open source project. It could just as easily be a lone wolf capable of writing in different styles (really not difficult if one spends enough time online, one gets exposed to all sorts of styles) or even just your run of the mill criminal gang. In fact, "multiaccount" cheating (where a single person has multiple accounts that interact with one another in a favourable manner, e.g. trading for stuff for reduced fees, or letting themselves be killed to pad stats, or expressing opinions leaving the impression of mass support, etc.) has been present in many MMO games for more than a decade. I recall an online game I was really into back in high school, eRepublik, which simulated real world politics, economics and warfare (in a really dumbed down version of course), and multiacounts were especially prevalent in politics, where candidates for election would often be padded by fake groups, or even entire countries being taken over by a gang of real people with like ten accounts each. The complexity is nothing new. The only indicator this could be a state actor is the long con aspect of it. The attacker(s) were looking into years between starting and actually being able to exploit.