3 ms·
>Also you failed to explain why Simply: Reality doesn't have "why"s. Reality has forces and fields or equivalent systems.
by mrguyorama 3y ago
>Also you failed to explain why
Simply: Reality doesn't have "why"s. Reality has forces and fields or equivalent systems.
- User23 3y agoWhere did forces and fields or equivalent systems come from? If your answer is some variant on "just because" then you don't have a better theory than some kind of necessary causality or contingency, in fact you have a mere absence of contemplation altogether. I never imagined "don't think about it" as being the metaphysical basis of the scientific enterprise though and it's hard to imagine science getting as far as it has if it were.