4 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mortality_from_H5N1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mortality_from_H5N1 > It's only the second confirmed case We know
by dist-epoch 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mortality_from_H5N1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mortality_from_H5N1
> It's only the second confirmed case
We know it doesn't transmit very well in humans. Luckily people have been working on that:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/controversial-bird-flu-research-published-how-worried-should-we-be/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/controv...
- throwup238 3y agohttps://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2024/p0401-avian-flu.html https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2024/p0401-avian-flu.html > The patient reported eye redness (consistent with conjunctivitis), as their only symptom, and is recovering. This is not a disease with a double digit mortality rate, no matter how many times people try to do math with a three digit sample size of poor people in developing countries. The CDC only caught this case because it's literally testing anyone with symptoms at the cattle farm.
- jazzyjackson 3y agoi'll never understand the compulsion to do these hybridization experiments to find out if its possible, how about we just live life assuming its possible and work on figuring out how to help humans recover from disease in general
- cryptonector 3y ago> We know it doesn't transmit very well in humans. Luckily people have been working on that: You make it sound as though they're working on making it transmit well in humans. Oh wait, they are! What's wrong with them?!