3 ms·

I bet they’re doing this to preemptively get around any future laws that prevent young people from signing up. No sign up required means no age verification ei

• diggan 3y ago
  Why would young people be forbidden from using LLMs in the future?
  • ben_w 3y ago
    Age-inappropriate responses, by whatever that means to whoever sets the rules.
  • jiayo 3y ago
    Social media has been the boogeyman for almost a decade now, and (red) states are at least sending out trial balloons regarding banning minors from accessing social media[1]. Prior to that, it was porn, and now we have age verification required by law. I'd argue that AI is a much bigger boogeyman than Instagram/Tiktok/Pornhub ever was. [1] No judgement of whether this is a good idea or not; in some sense it probably is; but I feel the current discourse is reactionary/political and not really about actual people's actual well being.
• Cheer2171 3y ago
  > No sign up required means no age verification either. That is an absurd conclusion to speculatively leap to, and wrong. Typically age-gating laws are written so that it doesn't matter if you have to create an account or not. Porn has always been the most common case for this kind of legislation. Most people don't create accounts to watch porn, and most porn is free without needing to sign up. The jurisdictions that require age verification still apply to porn sites where you don't need to sign up.