4 ms·
Having actually read the book I'd say whoever you've been speaking to has an agenda they're trying to cater to. Read it and decide for yourself.
by forgetfreeman 3y ago
Having actually read the book I'd say whoever you've been speaking to has an agenda they're trying to cater to. Read it and decide for yourself.
- karaterobot 3y agoI am not the person you responded to, but I have read Zinn and yes, it is very obviously written with a bias. That is to say, not only does he have inevitable subjective bias that all historians have, he is very pointedly writing his book as a corrective. The book has many good qualities, but neutrality is not among them. This isn't a problem unless the people who read it aren't aware of that.