> libc is big and complicated and most programs only use a tiny fraction of it. Is libc a problem for the ecosystem? IMO yes. I definitely believe having basic

> libc is big and complicated and most programs only use a tiny fraction of it. Is libc a problem for the ecosystem? IMO yes. I definitely believe having basic common functionality (malloc, printf, memcpy etc.) provided by one library with all the crazy/obscure stuff that very few people need or want somewhere else would be an improvement.