3 ms·
Let's use the current theory that this is a state sponsored attack. If that's the case, another Jia Tan will be recruited. The identity of a single person simpl
by redserk 3y ago
Let's use the current theory that this is a state sponsored attack. If that's the case, another Jia Tan will be recruited. The identity of a single person simply doesn't matter. All that matters is that the attack was attempted.
Consider the issue of candidates who lie in the interviewing process by hiring other people to interview on their behalf. Now replace "interview" with "attend conference". This is just adding another vector of blind trust waiting to be abused.
- gunapologist99 3y agoIt raises the bar quite a bit. Especially when you've met Jia Tan and the new Jia Tan is obviously not the same person. Meeting in person is quite literally the opposite of blind trust. Blind trust would be assuming that the person physically sitting on the other end of the internet connection and controlling Jia Tan's keys is the same Jia Tan you had lunch with a few months ago.
- redserk 3y agoYou cannot prove the person behind the keyboard is the person who is meeting up with people. This is blind trust because of the assumption that the person is the same.